di Luigi Sturniolo
Il 1. luglio 2002 aveva inizio il 1. Campeggio contro il Ponte. Finiva il tempo del movimento d’opinione ed iniziava quello del movimento di lotta. Da allora la misura delle nostre reasons has been verified in addition to their reasonableness in their ability to mobilize. The square, you know, is merciless. If you do not grow up arrears, I will point out. The movement has since grown in each step. Although each step has been living with the father's mood of the audit.
From 2002 to 2004 was the time of campsites. It 'been around the ability of group that has built the "weight" of the movement. E 'means that they have become more visible and have become credible.
In 2005 began the period of the No Net Bridge. Founded as a temporary consortium of organizations has proven to be stable up to the event more important from the numerical point of view, the manifestation of 20,000 on January 22, 2006. A path, this, that has changed the balance of the center around this theme, leading to the exclusion of the bridge over the Strait from the priority projects during the Prodi government.
In its re-start, after the period of the center-left government and the re-launch Bridge by Berlusconi, the Network Bridge No restarted the work of building opposition to the Bridge from the conditions of the Pact of Mutual Aid . It was decided, that is, to abandon the size of coordination structures, and hence the liturgy of Representatives, of vetoes, mediation of disputes, to give a life experience that had the characteristics of an instrument of mobilization, network of activists, a non-representative, non-synthetic. Party da Messina, the model was assumed, with the manifestation of December 19, also from the shore of Calabria. The Internet has become, well, open source, not proprietary.
The presentation of the team that will build the bridge over the Strait ", so called it Ciucci, held Feb. 12 at Messina has opened a new phase of the whole affair. The most significant element of this new phase was the message that was sent to the area. "We're playing for keeps," was said to politics, university, professional associations, trade unions. Landslides or mudslides, the money (those that come) over a bridge. Do not assume that it is still dip into the real artifact of the cross (the same Rubegni, CEO of Impregilo, a few days ago declared that he did not know yet if the Government really wants to stop at the Bridge or preliminary work). Well, this is the game at the time: the preliminary work (side and plywood). For these were announced 1.3 billion (to be taken from funds FAS). With the recapitalization (other public money) announced their intention to do the design. The money for the construction of the bridge should be recovered through the market (banks). Ed è una incognita assoluta.
A Cannitello hanno già aperto quello che qualcuno ha definito un cantiere fantasma, ma che qualcun altro ha detto garantire il pagamento della penale ad Impregilo in caso di interruzione dei lavori. A Messina pare si aggirino già strani individui incaricati di iniziare l’opera di monitoraggio ambientale (alla quale partecipano, tra gli altri, i “compagni” della Nautilus di Vibo Valentia). Il progetto definitivo è stato annunciato per fine anno. Insomma, sembrerebbe che siamo alle grandi manovre. Contro le grandi manovre abbisognerebbe una Rete No Ponte grande. O, almeno, una grande Rete No Ponte. E così non è. Negli anni abbiamo assistito all’estinguersi di varie esperienze nate all’interno del movimento, le caratteristiche del territorio non esprimono elementi comunitari come quelli della Val di Susa, né a facile costruire la dimensione territoriale del No Dal Molin (possibile anche attraverso la disponibilità di un congruo numero di attivisti), le reti di movimento vivono (e la sinistra in genere vive) una fase di arretramento.
Nel momento di massima esposizione, in un momento che si preannuncia cruciale, la Rete è al suo minimo di potenza.
Che fare? Di certo, non pensare di riprodurre esperienze mutuate da altri territori, per quanto detto prima. Sulla piazza messinese, ad esempio, le mobilitazioni si sono sempre date secondo caratteristiche di tipo metropolitano (Messina è still a city of 250,000 inhabitants and has a very large province): small groups of activists with an acceptable investments, in terms of numerical events. Difficult, so bring the popular committees, as well as damage in Val di Susa, for the simple fact that there is the kind of people, there is the valley, it is not the overcoming of the pre-existing subjectivity. Also difficult to bring the Venetian model because there is a readiness militant and even defend the country in terms of quasi-conservative is unacceptable in an area already largely affected like ours.
Absolutely not, however, you can save Network as it is, which could become the subject of other code, used and usable.
must continue to weave the network, understand that a battle so big as the one against the bridge can only be overcome with a great social covenant that requires a different use of resources (no one for so many do), be aware that individual nodes are not in direct contact with all the others, but the plot defines the total force. A total movement of variable geometry in which they are entitled to citizenship of individuals, committees, associations, unions, political parties, wide margins of autonomy. A movement in which the network has the function to connect and to create the great events. To discuss this and define the next steps we will have to give us an appointment to extra-territorial meeting. Until a new wave will not, however, want a sense of responsibility that we continue to hold barrels with the tools available.
08:04:10
0 comments:
Post a Comment