|
| This picture refers to events during the failed renewal unit 2008, which resulted, in part, with the "pact for her work in June 2009. |
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
What Does The Ending Of The Incredible Hulk Mean?
Friday, February 18, 2011
How To Connect My 3 Dongle
Many of us choose copyleft to protect software and intellectual works they produce but do not often have clear ideas about what license it is better to choose what to allow and what not to those who make use of what has been achieved. We asked the lawyer Luca Sileni
Wikimedia Italy to help us understand better.
In general, when it comes to free and copyleft licenses do you mean?
It means all those licenses that are alternatives to traditional copyright.
speaking in everyday language (even by virtue of the fact that the meaning of "copyright" is not its della lingua italiana ma di quella inglese), per copyright si intende solitamente il classico “tutti i diritti riservati” che un determinato autore ha sulla propria opera.
Le licenze libere ognuna a proprio modo, liberano (appunto) uno o più diritti esclusivi dell’autore dell’opera in favore dell’utilizzatore finale.
Il copyleft, quindi, non è altro che il termine con cui si identificano tutte quelle licenze che siano alternative al copyright e che quindi concedono (ognuna a proprio modo e secondo propri limiti) tutta una serie di facoltà specifiche all’utilizzatore finale (o fruitore). Facoltà che è l’autore a decidere di concedere, spogliandosi parzialmente di uno o più that their rights are in favor of those who enjoys his own work.
If I say GPL do you respond?
The GPL, full name GNU General Public License, a license is used for software commonly known as open source. It represents one of the first licenses so-called "free" and was in the late 80's by Richard Stallman and Eben Moglen to release the software that was created within the GNU project (which stands for GNU is Not Unix), born in 1983 with the intent to build a completely free operating system and released following an alternative management of copyright.
addition to the GPL, as that related to software , Was also developed the GFDL (GNU Free Documentation License) free license to use the manuals and documentation of the software released in GPL.
This license is for a long time been one of the few instruments that are related to the open source world, which allow you to create text freely accessible and modifiable by anyone.
Precisely because of these characteristics has been licensed since 2001 taken from Wikipedia.
Today, however, are also widely used Creative Commons
Creative Commons licenses have been born at the turn of 2002 and 2003 thanks to the non-profit Creative Commons. " These licenses now have a good reputation and "luck" because of their ease of application and understanding, even by those not familiar with legal texts.
These licenses have a modular structure, ie, given a basic license, the author can decide what additional clauses inserted in the final license. For each clause represents a major restriction in the faculty's work.
The 'Cc, by, nc, nd "(for example) identified the Creative Commons (CC) which allows the end user to freely disclose the work under the conditions that the original author of the same (by) and it also requires not to modify the work (nd=no opere derivate) e a non sfruttarla commercialmente (nc=no sfruttamento commerciale).
la differenza sostanziale tra le due licenze che ha descritto in cosa sta?
La GFDL è una licenza univoca mentre le Creative Commons sono una serie di licenze modulari che consentono all’autore di decidere quali facoltà concedere a chi fruisce dell’opera.
La GFDL (rapportandola con le Creative Commons) è molto simile alla Cc,by,sa, tant’è che negli ultimi tempi (grazie a degli specifici accorgimenti giuridici utilizzati nel testo della versione 3.0 di quest’ultima licenza) la Wikimedia Foundation ha preso la decisione di affiancare – nei propri projects - including the historic GFDL DC, by, you know that, to date, far more widely used and circulated.
Both licenses, however, include two major "commitments" for those going to benefit from the work granted by this permit, ie, the name of the authors of the work (by) in the case of reuse of the same obligation to release any derivative works always with the same license (sa = Same attribution).
What characterizes the Creative Commons? As mentioned
CC licenses have a modular structure substantially, so - even referring to those already made -, oltre alla generica indicazione “Cc” che indica la licenza di base, e al “By” che identifica la necessità di indicare l’autore/autori dell’opera in caso di diffusione e/o riutilizzo, l’autore potrà scegliere di aggiungere una o più delle seguenti clausole:
Sa=Same Attribution (condividere allo stesso modo): obbligo di utilizzare la medesima licenza per ogni eventuale opera derivata da quella originaria;
Nc=Non commerciale: divieto assoluto di uso commerciale dell’opera (questo divieto non opera – come è logico – per l’autore);
Nd=Non opere derivate: divieto assoluto di trarre opere derivate da quella originaria.
L’elenco complete with all the licenses can be found on the official website of the Creative Commons
How important are these licenses for free culture?
These licenses represent a tool that allows greater and easier spread of free culture.
Undoubtedly, if the Creative Commons or GFDL had never been written, everyone would have still been able to create a site like Wikipedia, an ad hoc working on a text that regulates the conditions of use of texts and images on the site, but it was certainly more laborious.
Having one type of license that has been structured and well defined allowing anyone to enter with ease and without Excessive risks to the world of copyleft licenses.
Why the author should choose one of these instead retain all rights?
The answer in this case can not be simple nor unique.
Each person can have different and multiple reasons for a choice like this, I happened to talk of the cartoonists that I have, quite frankly, respondents that have adopted this type of licensing, however, because many readers downloaded the cartoons from their blog and in this way, at least, they are entitled to do under certain conditions.
Others choose the free licenses for purely ethical reasons, directly related free culture and the idea that knowledge can not be subject to commercialization.
Others, again, calling to free licenses to allow their work to enjoy a greater chance of movement, without giving up future "expected" earnings (many bands emerging choose CC licenses for this very reason).
What are the factors to consider when choosing a license?
be gauged mainly the targets they have and what we want to draw from his work.
If your aims are, for example, the maximum diffusion without sacrificing profit, then it can be suitable for a license that allows the end user to enjoy the work and redistribute it freely, but at the same preventing the commercial exploitation and to make any derivative work.
If, however, the aim is to see the author's own work freely used by anyone, "embellished" or, if you will, "modified" by subsequent actions of others, then it will certainly Cc, by, to know the license may be suited to these needs.
You can also make profits by using these licenses? And how?
Absolutely. Given that the author is, at the time of the creation of un’opera d’arte, il detentore di tutti i diritti sulla stessa, il concedere alcune facoltà all’utilizzatore finale non significa assolutamente rinunciare totalmente ai diritti di sfruttamento economico su tale opera.
Un musicista che pubblichi un proprio brano in Cc,by,nc,nd (ad esempio) potrà tranquillamente produrre e vendere un proprio cd, oppure far normalmente pagare il biglietto per i propri concerti. Semplicemente la sua opera potrà viaggiare libera in rete (ma anche fuori dalla rete) senza bisogno che sia obbligatorio pagare un corrispettivo per ascoltare il brano.
Anche alcuni artisti conosciuti, su tutti i Nine Inch Nails, hanno deciso di adottare licenze simili a queste, proprio perché i fan della band continuano comunque ad acquistare i cd del gruppo e ad andare ai concerti, nonostante possano scaricare i brani in modo gratuito dal sito della band.
Discorso analogo può essere fatto per le opere letterarie. Un determinato autore può inserire sul suo sito il testo integrale del proprio romanzo, ma allo stesso tempo stamparlo e venderlo tramite ordinari canali commerciali.
In caso di violazione di una licenza cosa succede? A chi bisogna rivolgersi? Chi è competente in materia?
Tralasciando la competenza territoriale (che dipenderà dalla nazionalità dell’artista e da tutta un’altra serie di fattori), qualora ci sia una violazione di una licenza copyleft, competente will still be the judicial authority, as it would be for breach of copyright. Basically
Creative Commons licenses - although not all agree on that doctrine - are nothing more than contracts that tie the author to the user, therefore, any breach of this Agreement, must be invoked before all 'judicial authority.
As mentioned, however, if one hand scholars such as Andrea Monti (feel fully applicable the regulation of the licensing contracts, where a license would amount to a so-called contract of adhesion. There is also another part of the doctrine, all Carlo Plain), which saw can qualify, even if not in all cases, the requisite authority as a mere license.
An act, therefore, with which you do not sign a real contract with the end user, but through which the author allows the user to perform a specific series of operations on his work.
Although it is not a free license that I would like to speak to the public domain because it has relevance to the topic.
The so-called public domain, identifies the point at which a given work are less than the rights of economic exploitation and all other rights, except as detto “diritto d’autore morale” che è diritto personalissimo ed imprescrittibile e che, di conseguenza, non decade mai.
Per esempio, il diritto di sfruttamento su una mia opera scadrebbe (secondo la nostra attuale normativa) dopo 70 anni dalla mia morte.
Trascorso tale termine chiunque potrebbe fruire liberamente di detta opera non violando – però – il diritto d’autore morale e, quindi, non potendo mai prescindere dall’attribuzione della paternità all’opera stessa (in parole povere nessuno potrebbe mai spacciare per propria un’opera di qualcun altro, benché sia diventata di pubblico dominio)
Monday, February 14, 2011
Fisher Price Safe Voyage Deluxe Canada
possible that even for a day dedicated to lovers must rely on the Internet? And fantasy, poetry, inspiration? Who knows how many women and men received the same tickets, same text message written by someone not from your partner! Do not just listen to your heart? It matters little if the message is ungrammatical, not poetic or rhetorical, it is irrelevant whether or not there, just a look, a caress, a smile that do more than words. In a holiday shopping so we give more importance to those who love sviliamolo and not with a Google search!
How To Prevent Eye Swelling While Crying
Hydroxycut Commercial
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Baked Pita Chips For Dipping
I take a distribution unstable because every day when I turn the pc do not know what will happen and I enjoy alternative solutions. Most of the time, when I install the updates, I forget to uncheck the ones that I know will have negative effects and I have to restore many things. I then opted to only install stable packages but I also noticed that the problems I had with Xserver have been fixed: Do not install two dependencies and I had to install the stable version again because I found myself with the command line without graphical user interface on every reboot . I must say that I have not had much to do in part with amsn because the 098.4 part only by root, but we do not want to waste so much time because I use so little that it matters little if it does not work. Preclude the fact that I do not clear the update I find myself having to reinstall the old version and every time because they are lazy, if you were to leave the ricapitare not working:) A strange thing that still remains is that, according to the network manager does not I have installed neither eth0 nor wlan0 I have never used nor even, as both work perfectly. Right now I'm using wlan0. I can see and switch between them through the network monitor.
Icedove I had to install and remove evolution to which I had used because I could not handle the mail: it was always the option to work offline and online was "off."
I had to "adapt" by replacing the software that I used, my needs to those of my distro but I learn a lot and then ... you know are a geek:)
Friday, February 11, 2011
What Is Near Syncope?
|
| Jack Kerouac |
Saturday, February 5, 2011
Felicity Shagwell Hairstyle
The article said that the child has a credit card, on which day of the week goes shopping wearing designer labels and lists. I
come to think that social services should intervene and entrust the child to a family best, infinitely poorer in material, but more full of love.
Children should not walk as if they were at a fashion show, must be comfortable, get dirty, get cuddles and attention and have no idea what the money!
What are the expectations of this little girl when it will take 10 years? What will have to ask or to do or see?
I am reminded of a passage in the Bible, that I'm Catholic, I always keep in mind, suddenly, I hope to do it right from the book of Ecclesiastes (3, 1-22).
an appropriate time for every purpose under heaven
time to create, time to die;
time to plant, time to uproot the planted;
time to kill, time to heal;
time to break down, time to build;
time to weep, a time to laugh;
time for mourning, time to dance;
time to throw stones, time to collect them;
time to embrace, time to break away from embracing;
time to look, time to lose;
to save time, time to throw away;
time to tear, time to heal;
time to keep silence, time to speak;
time to love, time to hate,
wartime, peacetime. What
profit, for those acts, in all his toil?
I know for a fact that the parents of the girl, who I quote on purpose, I do not know.
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
How To Tighten A Sew-in Weave
Yesterday afternoon I thought it good to switch to Debian Sid and what did I do? I open the file sources.list) in / etc / apt and I replaced with a sid lenny, then I did an apt-get update and apt-get dist-upgrade. Luck would have it the grub2 crashes and reboot of course the odious error 15. Do not panic, you try a live, I found one of Ubuntu and I typed in the terminal grub-install / dev / sda. There 's been too well (I said), I read about cases you do not get so easily, but when you restart the computer game only in text mode. Then login as user, startx and here is the graphical interface but how to restore the graphical login? I read a lot but nothing, was not the X server does not work. I open synaptic and go to check if GDM (Gnome Display Manager) is installed: it was not! And were not many other things, like gedit for example, my solitary pysol, amsn, the wireless (but I expected).
As I have gone all this stuff? I really do not know.
install everything in synaptic, but I resolve to pysol SourgeForge up but with so much effort because I have tried other avenues without success. Compile and go. I try to install
il wireless come avevo fatto con Lenny ma niente. Dopo tanto cercare trovo questa guida , la seguo ma alla fine quando scrivo
modprobe ath5k mi dice che i driver di configurazione devono essere tutti dentro /etc/modprobe.d. Copio quindi nella directory modprobe.conf e a questo punto riavvio. Il wireless funziona! E funziona pure il led che indica la connessione (non si era mai acceso finora).
Spero di aver finito. Ma chi può dirlo? E in ogni caso, cosa mi inventerò in un altro pomeriggio di noia? :)