I want to make a brief analysis of what was and there was one hundred years ago. By this reasoning, I just want to realize what we have achieved, what has been established and what has been demolished, ed, eventualmente, cosa abbiamo perso nell'arco di cent'anni.
Dunque . Cento anni fa non c'era la televisione. Questa è la prima cosa che mi viene in mente, dal momento che fa così tanto parte della vita della gente. Non c'era il telefono così come lo conosciamo oggi, ma neppure come lo conosciamo a partire dalla metà del secolo scorso. Infatti era appannaggio di pochi; vent'anni fa non c'erano i telefoni cellulari (i primi già si mostravano, ma erano poco meno che mattoni, ricordo che erano enormi e costosi, con antenne di 30 o 40 centimetri). Cento anni fa non si poteva ancora partorire in sicurezza, la medicina era molto indietro, ma lo sviluppo industriale cominciava con l'inquinamento environment, and we can say that in recent years is beginning to do damage at that level. The workers had no rights (like today). The unions were still far off (like today), and those who had money and wanted to keep them close, if anything, make more and more, without worrying too much about the way (like today). Forty years ago, through a strenuous struggle of the working class, which has its roots in the dawn of history, known defeat, we have obtained the rights to be inviolable, such as a decent wage, which jumped in the last ten years . Today a member of a union is an obstacle in some areas more than others, which prevents the emergence of the right to professional growth of the worker does not even provide a pretext to deal with discrimination severely penalizes times with infamous or degrading work without rotation, is seen by the master with suspicion, as if it were a threat to get rid of that first opportunity.
hundred years ago, there were no cars, widely understood as well, to everyone. Again we went with the buggy, who had, but poor on foot, by bike most fortunate and the poor. There was not expected to live very long, but often, living in hardship, I wonder if it was not a fortune. The alternative was to be rich, but even here, the money could not buy health care who do not yet exist. So we lived for less time. But it is to be noted that many diseases were better tolerated and fought to a healthy body, physical person who must not go hungry or live in the dirt.
hundred years ago there was Antonio Gramsci, today we Massimo D'Alema. One hundred years ago there was the festival of San Remo, and who is trying to make a policy for workers ... Well, they were bitter kale. Women had no vote. There was a monarchy. There was no fascism - just missing - that is the case today, although in different form by two decades. In fact it is one of the negative forces that are known to adapt to the times, concealing, finding new forms, avoiding the criticism of weak minds through thin channels of propaganda and studied, that make you swallow the shit even if it is bitter, but because of another color. It is appropriate of the blue, without abandoning the black of his soul. The emigrants were we, the poor in the barrel in search of work abroad. I do not know with regard to corruption, but certainly the most developed level we have reached our times. The network business / political / mafia / business, as we know it (? ) today, a hundred years ago was not there. But someone tell me if I'm wrong.
There was no nuclear power, there was no plastic (it is assumed that in 1920 - from Wikipedia), but there was this desire to do harm to others which have permeated continuously le vicende umane. Si potrebbe dire che, a parte qualche dettaglio, non è cambiato nulla, dal punto di vista umano. Appena ha potuto, chi di dovere, ha smantellato tutte le conquiste positive raggiunte da parte della collettività. Poiché tali conquiste, lo ponevano qualche gradino in meno al di sopra degli altri, e non sia mai! Qui entrano in ballo i dettagli di cui sopra, per nulla irrilevanti. Adoperati coscientemente e scientificamente da alcune lobby, hanno contribuito a domare gli animi ed a sedare lo spirito critico contenuto in essi. Si prospetta, se non ci si da da fare, la nascita di generazioni votate alla sottomissione. E con la manovra della manipolazione storica, nessuno potrà venire a conoscenza delle lotte fatte per la libertà.
I want to end this post with membership of the editorial Padellaro Antonio on "the daily" on Tuesday 16 February. I too am outraged about the treatment of asylum children, wrapped in their coats, inside a kindergarten classroom without heat, uncovered by an investigation of "live", the program RAI3, aired Sunday, February 14 last year. Also I wonder: Where is the civilization of this policy of indiscriminate cuts? And the opposition goes to the festival. At least 100 years ago 'there was the festival.
0 comments:
Post a Comment