di Luigi Sturniolo
Venerdì 12 febbraio il Ministro Altero Matteoli sarà a Messina per presentare ufficialmente, insieme al sindaco Giuseppe Buzzanca e all'amministratore Executive Officer Strait of Messina Pietro Ciucci, the design of the bridge over the Strait. It is not, at this point in history, to dispute the seriousness of the environmental impact of the work, which also would be huge, but to decide on the use of public resources.
Landslides and landslides in recent days demonstrate once again how fragile the territory of our province and the need for action to its safety measures. It is a question of people's lives. E 'is essential to avoid another October 1.
The presentation of the project (there's) the bridge over the Strait of Friday, February 12, with the presence of Ciucci and Matteoli, it seems, from this point of view, an event even more out of place and out of context. It is not, at this point in history, to dispute the seriousness of the environmental impact of the work, which also would be huge, but to decide on the use of public resources.
Besides the Minister for Infrastructure, responding to parliamentary questions during question time, has made it clear that the article will be achieved through the use of the market and through project finance (and this is all a game to play, We'll see what what will be the counterpart to an economic enterprise obviously deficient), while project and preliminary work will be carried out with public money (basically, recapitalization and FAS).
is the subject of dispute. Public resources must be allocated, as the government considers, in activities designed to work that hard to see the light, which would, however, a devastating impact on the territory, which has a significant impact on improving the infrastructure of the South (because this is at least the level at which you have to look) and that would benefit only a few large contractors, and some big studio, which would make it through the intricate web of access and devastating, cement, landfills, roads, even more fragile our hills? Or
public resources should be devoted, as he says those who oppose the operation-Ponte, for the safety of citizens, enabling them protection from seismic and geological, to the revival of public transport infrastructure that are actually useful to the proximity improving links in our area?
Matteoli Minister said in Parliament that the Government intends to make the bridge but, however, the preparatory works will, however, useful to the territory. There is some cleverness in this policy. It gives a nod to those who, without believing or even being contrary to the Bridge, you might think to take advantage of the flow finanziario promesso (che di certo sarà in gran parte dirottato nelle tasche dei tecnici delle imprese legate al General Contractor).
La frase del Ministro tradisce, però, una chiara incertezza politica in quanto confessa la non certezza della bancabilità (salvo arditi meccanismi a carattere speculativo o che rimandino sulle generazioni future il debito accumulato) dell’opera e il rischio di dilapidare risorse di tutti.
0 comments:
Post a Comment