of Sturniolo
Louis (Feb. 20 speech at the conference of the Left on the hydrogeological Ecology and Freedom in the province of Messina)
The hydrogeological land, the investigation of Florence on emergencies and the presentation of the bridge over the Straits of Messina in Messina held on February 12 are part of a narrative that should be considered in its unit size.
policy disasters and major public works are a response of elite political and economic crisis and constitute ways in which public resources become a source of enrichment for the few rather than the occasion of redistribution of wealth.
The event or project, in this perspective, they have nothing to do with society's needs. I'm just an opportunity to make gains
Within a dimension from low empire, corruption and economic crisis end up walking together.
not, then perhaps a case if the Court of Auditors, in this part of the beginning of 2010, reported on three critical issues such as the financial aspects of the design of the bridge over the Strait, the securitization of healthcare debt, corruption. There are three cases in which the business plan is played entirely borne by society as a whole by increasing the size of all debt, while the benefits fall into the hands of a few contractors, some corrupt administrator and financial channels.
When we took the initiative no bridge in response to announcements of Berlusconi of wanting to replace the work the center of its political-media program we place the safety and seismic hydrogeology of the area, along with the revival of public transport as main points of a spatial strategy vertenziale. "The money from the bridge to the security of the territories" became our slogan. We did it before and after October 1, before and after the deaths in the landslides.
And it is from October 1 next to it and the days that we have verified the nature of political emergency. In those days we have witnessed on the field and the communication strategy for the management of an administrative practice that has made the ordinary extraordinary and the ordinary overtime. In short, there seemed to verify the field as the Strait of Messina Bridge is part of a strategy that includes major projects, events and emergency procedures following vertical choices, the concentration of resources, the drain of public resources, involvement of public and private parties, limiting the information, of questioning the practicability same democratic and which constitute a model to real policies permeable divider.
E 'this is why those who accuse us of not wanting to politicize the movement opposing the bridge to a transverse dimension (indifferent, that is, to the profound nature of the problem) replied that the discriminant is not the partisan nature of the statement but the contents that are expressed and that the opposition to the great work it too much to handle out of a contextualization of the same. It is no longer, in other words, to argue on whether or not a work. This is another idea of \u200b\u200bfighting for state relationship with the land and another idea of \u200b\u200busing public resources. It is built on this conflict.
The question of the bridge is no longer one of many to deal with. It will be the key to understanding this area. It will be the point of view through which it will aim the future. What you do or Bridge no, sarà così. Almeno fino a quando sarà in vigore l’attuale equilibrio politico nazionale.
Contro il Ponte va costruito conflitto. Consenso e conflitto, come si diceva una volta. E non ci si può limitare alla partecipazione alle manifestazioni o all’adesione formale. Non si sarebbe compresa la posta in gioco. Davvero non mi pare ci siano molte cose più importanti da fare. Davvero, oltre tutto, non mi sembra ci siano molte altre cose nelle quali registriamo una tale internità.
Louis (Feb. 20 speech at the conference of the Left on the hydrogeological Ecology and Freedom in the province of Messina)
The hydrogeological land, the investigation of Florence on emergencies and the presentation of the bridge over the Straits of Messina in Messina held on February 12 are part of a narrative that should be considered in its unit size.
policy disasters and major public works are a response of elite political and economic crisis and constitute ways in which public resources become a source of enrichment for the few rather than the occasion of redistribution of wealth.
The event or project, in this perspective, they have nothing to do with society's needs. I'm just an opportunity to make gains
Within a dimension from low empire, corruption and economic crisis end up walking together.
not, then perhaps a case if the Court of Auditors, in this part of the beginning of 2010, reported on three critical issues such as the financial aspects of the design of the bridge over the Strait, the securitization of healthcare debt, corruption. There are three cases in which the business plan is played entirely borne by society as a whole by increasing the size of all debt, while the benefits fall into the hands of a few contractors, some corrupt administrator and financial channels.
When we took the initiative no bridge in response to announcements of Berlusconi of wanting to replace the work the center of its political-media program we place the safety and seismic hydrogeology of the area, along with the revival of public transport as main points of a spatial strategy vertenziale. "The money from the bridge to the security of the territories" became our slogan. We did it before and after October 1, before and after the deaths in the landslides.
And it is from October 1 next to it and the days that we have verified the nature of political emergency. In those days we have witnessed on the field and the communication strategy for the management of an administrative practice that has made the ordinary extraordinary and the ordinary overtime. In short, there seemed to verify the field as the Strait of Messina Bridge is part of a strategy that includes major projects, events and emergency procedures following vertical choices, the concentration of resources, the drain of public resources, involvement of public and private parties, limiting the information, of questioning the practicability same democratic and which constitute a model to real policies permeable divider.
E 'this is why those who accuse us of not wanting to politicize the movement opposing the bridge to a transverse dimension (indifferent, that is, to the profound nature of the problem) replied that the discriminant is not the partisan nature of the statement but the contents that are expressed and that the opposition to the great work it too much to handle out of a contextualization of the same. It is no longer, in other words, to argue on whether or not a work. This is another idea of \u200b\u200bfighting for state relationship with the land and another idea of \u200b\u200busing public resources. It is built on this conflict.
The question of the bridge is no longer one of many to deal with. It will be the key to understanding this area. It will be the point of view through which it will aim the future. What you do or Bridge no, sarà così. Almeno fino a quando sarà in vigore l’attuale equilibrio politico nazionale.
Contro il Ponte va costruito conflitto. Consenso e conflitto, come si diceva una volta. E non ci si può limitare alla partecipazione alle manifestazioni o all’adesione formale. Non si sarebbe compresa la posta in gioco. Davvero non mi pare ci siano molte cose più importanti da fare. Davvero, oltre tutto, non mi sembra ci siano molte altre cose nelle quali registriamo una tale internità.
0 comments:
Post a Comment