Anche qui, recensendo un libro, “ Il Vangelo secondo Gesù Cristo ”, hotratto lo spunto per un nuovo post; visto che le vicissitudini socio politicheabnormi e deprimenti Italian lead me to think ...
What makes us good Christians?
limititerreni certainly be aware of our body makes us behave a certain way, but nonper all, this is the same way. Some, for example, feel that they have, after death, no other life available, believe they have the right dicomportarsi like best, and believes that doing everything glipassa the head, will, at least , its desires and moriràtranquillo satisfied and contented. Instead there is anyone, even not believing in the spirit, considers that it must comply with all other persons, rules and laws delvivere civilian who goes even more in there, and wants to preserve nature erispettare well as animals and the environment in which we live, us and them. It asks you to those who were devout Catholics, they kill, steal, spessomembri of mafias, are at least fantasioseper justifications for their crimes? None. Of course we condemn, but we do not solve the problemalegato closely to the consciousness that each of us has a certain fact, behavior, mode of action.
often said " unconsciousness," but it is not. It 's a different consciousness, a lack derivado that objective, and often due to a lack of resources perraggiungerla by empathic awareness, sensitivity of the person who versofatti not relate closely, which allow intercalation nellevicissitudini others, to ensure that problems are also a problemidi all, and in doing so we strive to find the solution that will enable the whole case, and all 'laospita environment, to preserve itself.
often in my life, I changed ideasulla deity, especially in this youth, but now I interrogosovente. I will do well? I'll do wrong? Nobody knows, nobody. E 'peròassolutamente legitimate. With the book "According to Jesus Christ IlVangelo , Saramago raises, or better, I think that puts the man in front of an important question: how to live la propria vita cessandodi essere succubi del sentire comune, liberandosi delle catene che sono leusanze e le dottrine, i dogmi, il pensiero dominante?
Noi siamo ciò che mangiamo e l’ambientedove cresciamo, ma se ci vengono dati i mezzi, o i giusti impulsi, anche inambito familiare, possiamo sviluppare una coscienza empatica che ci permetteràdi avere un senso critico, non ci lasceremo sedurre dall’accidia del non farnulla quando vedremo un’ingiustizia, anche se non è fatta a noi in persona.
Ed è in quest’empatia con Gesù che sigioca la storia di questo libro; con l’empatia che si ha verso Giuseppe sindall’inizio del libro, che apre ad an old way of conceiving the Traglia men and women, stupid and sexist, and of these with the Godhead, and sealed regardless of the pain that often results in not without a vein dipiacere. In the upheaval of the fees we are used to from childhood, we discover an earthly dimension, real, Jesus, who must misurarsicon a truth that is revealed, much, different from what he learned nellesue frequenting the synagogue, as it is rather other than the story cuica have used films and cheesy indoctrination, discorsireligiosi made by priests and popes of all times and places. But not lasciamociingannare from religious discourse. The message is that trying to thwart ilvolo who has immense power, there is always a sorry plight. The unicascappatoia will be to never accept, outset, the rule that siimpone those who want to follow an idea at all costs. The end does not justify imezzi when the end is an end of suffering, and even more so when imezzi inflict suffering, a toll that, inevitably, will call more blood and suffering. Through the story of raw emotions concretee of events and times, as well as cruel in lororealismo brutal, until it fades into nothingness, the tale of the Christmas story, a story that only latenerezza with the last film about " The Passion of the Christ " capital if they have gravity and suffering.
emancipating the masses do not come? Anchequesta is another question that arises, given that, since the dawn deitempi, there were always multitudes that they conform, then as now, the interests of powerful inculcated through various means the single thought. As well as deceiving the ending, which I do not want, here reveals many menotruculento, and sweet, compared to scenes described above: it sounds a bit like a sugary given after the beatings inflicted on a Christian, that the link vedesvilito human / for which God gives life. There are many things to which we hannoabituato years of indoctrination, and others are only hinted at, as a matter of importance dipoca. But the strange thing is that if you miss, the spintafinale, the moral he draws is that we should, for the menoquelli still not even think about it, to open eyes, to look attornoe draw conclusions own, apart from drastically pensieromaggioritario not dampen the ever critical, especially to things that cistanno to my heart: let us to our surroundings with the same commitment Concu take care of ourselves and if we do not take good care of ourselves, we learn to love, that does not mean the pursuit of personal success conqualsiasi half. If until now we have loved with all noistessi something, do not be ashamed to repudiate and terminate it if, later, there appears intutto his deception.
0 comments:
Post a Comment