All or almost all students of Economics, is have questioned or have been involved, the choices of the new dean Bodega. The university campaign is over. This is the time to do serious analysis on the changes as discussed by the students.
should start by saying that we absolutely do not intend to be candidate as a force of pure conservation, but on the contrary we intend to discuss the merits of the measures and support any initiative that is aimed at improving the University and will promote the students.
First, consistent with what was said last April, now need a better education, a merit-selection of students and improvement of the ancillary services of the university.
It is building something he considers these elements. We can only appreciate the change of plans of study leading to a real differentiation between the different curricula. While in the past between those who did marketing and management, there was no real differentiation today. In addition, he had given some basic examinations required for the formation of a student of economics is good thing, but something that we think negative, compared to those who have registered in the past, is that it has greatly reduced the opportunity to select courses from follow (the famous GDE). Have a plan of study that it complies with the specific interests of the student is important.
Of all the changes, as is discussed reducing the number of appeals. Maybe there were too many, and perhaps had spread the "fashion" of the 'let's examine groped "we can not but observe that (3 +1 +1) is wrong, does not encourage students to stay in synch with the examinations, but instead opens the door to the outside course. We wonder a) why were reduced by three appeals, two were not enough? And b) because it has not adopted such a formula (2 +2 +1), because I challenge you to find students who are able to keep up with so few appeals and matters more difficult than before. A speech of this kind with the student representatives is right to do so. We also ask why there is little clarity in conveying the content and the reasons for this reform. You often come across the wrong information and even less rare is the possibility that the professors give contradictory and wrong, especially for students of second and subsequent years. When asked, a professor who teaches a subject of the third year, the validity for its students of such changes, the answer was "Yes for you is the reduction of appeals and also the leap," is utterly wrong. Why so much misinformation and lack of clarity?? Many are still in doubt.
These are the most important new features, but there are also introducing del blocco delle lezioni durante la settimana dei recuperi, la stessa suddivisione dei gruppi dei corsi (banalmente non dobbiamo cambiare da un corso all’altro il compagno di banco per via del cognome diverso), parziali per tutti i corsi tranne i diritti,…
I cambiamenti fatti sono molti e altrettanti ne sono previsti. Durante la campagna elettorale i gruppi hanno formulato molte idee, programmi validi che avevano punti di incontro ma non tutti sono riusciti ad eleggere una rappresentanza (molto ci sarebbe da dire a riguardo di un sistema che non rappresenta le minoranze). Sarebbe uno strumento utile, e mi rivolgo a tutti i gruppi studenteschi dell’università Cattolica, se si costituisse un tavolo, consultivo, in cui ci si confronta on the different proposals and try to do even ideas from those who have been excluded from the institutional representatives. It would be a great test of maturity and a greater incentive to work for the university and to involve as many students as possible. Might be an idea to organize, for example, call an assembly where all students to face the Bodega Head to understand and discuss the reforms that need the power, because a widely accepted way and not simply imposed from above leads to greater satisfaction and achievement of real goals.
Luca Clouds
0 comments:
Post a Comment