Never heard the phrase: "After all politicians are all alike? Sentence is not entirely foreign to the newspaper and hear his good reasons to come. In fact if you hear the news that the allegations of political coming out here on that other investigations, allegations as allegations in the 2006 elections when they wanted to know who had made electoral fraud. There have been serious? And above all: Who made them? The thing was simply forgotten. And if you happen to see a political debate will be even clearer, surely someone will see that instead of answering a question with arguments e ragionamenti incomincerà a dire (o gridare): “E perché? Voi non avete fatto la stessa cosa?” evitando di dimostrare di essere superiore all’altra parte ma affermando di essere tali e quali. Ho consciamente tirato fuori un altro argomento: la tv.
Parlando di tv, vi è mai capitato di guardare un po’ di telegiornali e di concludere per sentito dire o per osservazioni personali: questo è di destra, questo è di sinistra? Così è naturale che ci si chieda: e per l’imparzialità? Come si fa? Compri la parabola! Compro la parabola. Nel telegiornale il tempo è più o meno così suddiviso: 15 minuti dedicati alle opinioni dei rappresentanti del governo, 1 minuti di replica opposition, another 15 minutes about what the government has to say about the performances of the opposition. Impartiality? Not always so.
Basically I hope you also know that there is a big difference whether the news is about a politician explaining his thought in the third person: "Mr. ... said ..." or whether it opens the link where it does not just talk in person, by creating a direct visual contact, but also exposing themselves over time it needs to be understood. I will reveal a secret: the political support goes mainly for the identification, ie in identifying people and opinions in specific. You would think: "Certainly what has replicated for one minute could be right, but frankly told me that other face to face, he made a full speech, he said many things, I see it more on television and sum up: I am most familiar. Even better then if I send mail for the beautiful pictures of him and his children, shows to be a good person, smiles and laughs with his children ... even better if he also tells a good joke that Starmie can not even funny! Mica I know nothing about him, deep down I just have to vote. " A goal
perhaps that of mass media do not really want a listener can understand and judge the information, and then you give them a hand, maybe trying to confuse giving a very large quantity of information but little depth and insecure, uncertain with news, fact and unfortunately, the journalists do not want (or can not) say "too much".
I know I'm confusing but it's all planned. Returning to the first: you never understood what the programs of the PD and the PDL? And because of PD and PDL there is only one L of a difference? The goal seems to double, meaning designed for two types of people: the first are those who try to understand what happens and make a decision. To them he was sent this message: that the right and left are equal, if they want to deepen the conversation will be difficult, because information can be found in front opposite and in some cases as the fake Gelmini that says there will be full time when there is no mathematical number of hours paid to do it or how the Russian accusation that the Left had rejected the referendum proposed by the parliamentary right to reduce (when did it happen?). False and real news, the voter is forced to give reasons based on their political preferences and not a discourse shared between projects and background information. And the Knight in all of this what does it do? Worsening the situation, I think. Have you ever wondered why one day he says one thing, the day after the denial? It may seem a bit 'undecided, you say. Too. The goal is another: he wants to show that it can saying one thing and can say the opposite thing and this is not the thing that matters. People may ask: "what is the position of Berlusconi on ...?" The answer is: "Ah, I do not know, but it looks good! I applaud all. " Which brings us to the second kind of people, those not careful, the voters who are more sympathetic, not looking but look what he said Berlusconi, the support person, not political ideas. His attitude just want to get this kind of result he contradicts himself and says, so what we are talking about is ridiculous, people are starting to not keep up, to be passive in its statements. It becomes important to the discourse politically, but the person, the emotional effect, its successes. Lately
then the matter gets even more complicated and I'm talking about him: "The separation from his wife" "We are not half the personal affairs", "Yes the candidates for the European Tissue," "Do not go to birthday but children must be that of an eighteen year old, "but then we learn more" The current eighteen Berlusconi attended, then he was a minor at the time! "denies Berlusconi, the former boyfriend confirms," \u200b\u200bThere are plots of the left "until the case broke Mills," Berlusconi has corrupted ", then Alfano is the challenge, so Berlusconi attacked the prosecutor, "The judiciary is a den of Communists", but while the tissues are removed and as a good candidate for the PDL remains Mastella, so you switch to the complaint Franceschini moral inadequacy of the Premier until the children do not complain and then immediately says: "Own goal of Franceschini." A bitch is not it?
Then the foreign press is complaining about why the Italians do not react, but perhaps do not even understand something, maybe not even know what is true and what is false and as soon as we are thinking here comes news of a new ready to confuse the ideas better. Many news and superficial. The policy already it is difficult for people who make it, who follows her home and then what to say?
So I turn to you, dear Italian citizen: you have not yet figured out that politics is not for you? There are football, the showgirls, TV programs and the good life to distract you, politics do not worry, someone has taken the field for us, one that says: "I think Ghe", which is a is done alone, or one to be given control of the situation, that will solve everything, so do not gotta worry about too much of the policy is difficult and complicated. And if this bothers you do not understand the things your not thinking about it, you can not understand everything, many things are alien to human reason, tutto il resto è una questione di fede.
In fondo lui l’ha detto di essere l’unto del Signore.
Daniele Gavazza
0 comments:
Post a Comment